Rasputin Bibliography Essay Example

Rasputin Bibliography Paper The Decline and Fall of the Romanov Dynasty It can be argued that Grigory Rasputin was responsible for the fall of the Romanov Dynasty to an extent. There are many aspects that Rasputin was the cause for Nicholas and his family losing their powers over the people of Russia. It is believed that Rasputin was only the catalyst that brought about widespread revolt. Rasputin played a very important role in the lives of the royal family, especially to the Tsar and Tsarina’s only son , Tsarevich Alexei, who was suffering a lot of pain from the disease Haemophilia. Rasputin was regarded as the last means to an end to cure the Tsar and the Tsarina’s haemophiliac son. They had tried to find a cure everywhere for their son and in 1905 ask the peasant healer to help. In 1908 when Alexei was seriously ill, Rasputin was called to Royal palace where he managed to stop the bleeding. From then on the Tsar referred to Rasputin as â€Å"our friend† displaying to the people the amount of trust they had in Rasputin. Tsar Nicholas II couldn’t stop the progression of revolution as he came to rule at a difficult time. He was out of touch with his people and was known as a leader that was no good, weak, hesitant; and extremely hard-headed. Tsar Nicholas II was at the time mainly concerned with his family issues instead of being focused on the political issues. He was also not prepared to efficiently rule a country where there was a massive variety of people with different languages, race, religion; and culture. It is reported that during Nicholas’s earlier years while his father was still in power, that he found government meetings boring and was not interested in the affairs of state. The Tsar wanted the country to still be ruled as an autocracy where the peasants and the working class had extremely below average standard of living, while the royal family live in a life filled with riches and extravagances. Tsar Nicholas undertook absolute command of the Russian army fighting on the Eastern Front in September 1915. As he spends most of time at the general headquarters (G. H. Q) the Tsarina now has taken over the responsibilities for domestic policy. We will write a custom essay sample on Rasputin Bibliography specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Rasputin Bibliography specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Rasputin Bibliography specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Over the duration of the next few months, the Tsarina dismissed ministers and their deputies in extremely hasty progression; during this time Rasputin served as the Tsarina’s advisor. Alexander Kerensky stood as a democratic socialist as a member of the Duma complained and states that â€Å"The Tsarinas blind faith in Rasputin led her to seek his counsel not only in personal matters but also on questions of state policy. General Alekseyev, held in high esteem by Nicholas II, tried to talk to the Tsarina about Rasputin, but only succeeded in making an implacable enemy of her. General Alexseyev told me later about his profound concern on learning that a secret map of military operations had found its way into the Tsarinas hands. But like many others, he was powerless to take any action. † The Word War I was the final impact that resulted in the fall of the Romanov Dynasty. When the war was announced there was a sensation of national pride, and everyone wanted to help out as best as they could. As the war commenced, it started to wear out resources and poorly trained peasants were forced to do the fighting where they weren’t equipped with weapons. Because of the lack of resources such as equipment and food, the army suffered a massive defeat by Germany who was more advanced and highly technologically advanced. As the war continued the casualties began to rise, in 1915 the war was the cause of over two million deaths. Due to the peasants fighting in the war there was no one to work with-in village because of this there was extreme food and goods shortage. The spirit of Russia began to decrease as losses on the battleground also including the unavailability of food and fuel took its toll on the people. The Tsar was responsible for the army’s defeat. Tsar Nicholas II lack of preparation into his role as a leader was initially one of the reason as to why the Romanov Dynasty failed. Many people blamed Rasputin for the fall of the Romanov Empire due to his close relationship to the Tsarina Alexandra, where she was heavily influenced by Rasputin and then in turn she influenced the Tsar. The Tsar was a ruler that was behind times instead of modernising his country; he chose to keep the country the way it was when his father was ruling. Many of his people wanted to revolutionize the country and move into a more advanced country. The Tsar was too stubborn to make decision on the advancement of Russia and chose to ignore it. Therefore Tsar Nicholas II was responsible for the fall of the Romanov Dynasty as the people wanted change. BIBLIOGRAPHY * Grigori Efimovich Rasputin [online] http://www. alexanderpalace. com/2006rasputin/index. html [accessed 19th March 2011] * Grigori Rasputin Biography [Online] http://www. biographybase. com/biography/rasputin_grigori. html [accessed 19th March 2011] * Gregory Rasputin: Biography. [Online] http://www. spartacus. schoolnet. co. uk/RUSrasputin. htm [accessed 19th March 2011] * Gilliard, P. Thirteen Years at the Russian Court. 2008 [Online] http://www. alexanderpalace. org/2006pierre/chapter_XII. html [accessed 19th March 2011] * The Decline and Fall of the Romanov Dynasty [Online] http://www. docshare. com/doc/162390/The-Decline-AndFall-Of-The-Romanov-Dynasty [accessed 23rd March 2011] * Radzinsky, E. 2001, The Rasputin File. Anchor Books * Shukman, H. 2009, Rasputin: An Introduction. The History Press [ 1 ]. Gregory Rasputin: Biography. [Online] http://www. spartacus. schoolnet. co. uk/RUSrasputin. htm [Date Accessed 18th March 2011]

Free Essays on The Burden Of Proof

â€Å"burden of proof† are not specifically mentioned within the U.S. Constitution however is implied in a several amendments. The burden of proof and where it lies has been the subject of many court cases and decisions. There are plenty of questions in the area of burden such as; where does it lie in civil suits, in what cases is the prosecutor bear more of the burden and where does the defendant, and so on. Many of the research provided here is from court cases and decisions that have shaped how the burden of proof is balanced. The constitution is used to shape the decisions that were reached by these court cases. In the Fourth amendment Americans are guaranteed to â€Å"†¦ be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (U.S. Constitution). There are a number of court cases that outline the requirements for searches without a warrant. Searches without a warrant require the owner or occupant’s permission and the law is specific in where the burden lies in situations where consent is granted to search. â€Å"Government has burden of proving that search without warrant was consented to by the defendant† (Kovach v U.S., 1971). In another case the question was raised as to whether the prosecutor must also prove that the search was consented to freely and voluntarily by the property owner. â€Å"When search is grounded upon consent burden of justification of search, that is, that consent was freely and voluntarily given, falls sq uarely upon prosecution; question is one of mental awareness so that act of consent was consensual act of one who knew what he was doing and had reasonable appreciation of nature and significance ... Free Essays on The Burden Of Proof Free Essays on The Burden Of Proof Burden of proof is defined as â€Å"the level of proof which different parties are required to demonstrate to persuade a jury or judge in a civil or criminal case.† The words â€Å"burden of proof† are not specifically mentioned within the U.S. Constitution however is implied in a several amendments. The burden of proof and where it lies has been the subject of many court cases and decisions. There are plenty of questions in the area of burden such as; where does it lie in civil suits, in what cases is the prosecutor bear more of the burden and where does the defendant, and so on. Many of the research provided here is from court cases and decisions that have shaped how the burden of proof is balanced. The constitution is used to shape the decisions that were reached by these court cases. In the Fourth amendment Americans are guaranteed to â€Å"†¦ be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (U.S. Constitution). There are a number of court cases that outline the requirements for searches without a warrant. Searches without a warrant require the owner or occupant’s permission and the law is specific in where the burden lies in situations where consent is granted to search. â€Å"Government has burden of proving that search without warrant was consented to by the defendant† (Kovach v U.S., 1971). In another case the question was raised as to whether the prosecutor must also prove that the search was consented to freely and voluntarily by the property owner. â€Å"When search is grounded upon consent burden of justification of search, that is, that consent was freely and voluntarily given, falls sq uarely upon prosecution; question is one of mental awareness so that act of consent was consensual act of one who knew what he was doing and had reasonable appreciation of nature and significance ...